Also, I just wanted to write an article featuring a numbered “How To” list, since they’re all the rage in blogging.
Rejection is a good thing. I like turning negatives on their head. How about turning positives on their head? What if we looked at a positive event to determine what can be done better, and hopefully reduce the number and severity of future negatives? The first time I received an acceptance letter it provided some lessons in using rejection as a learning experience.
Several years ago I submitted some travel stories to Traveler’s Tales, a publisher of travel writing anthologies. TT were gearing up to publish their inaugural China edition and I’d written quite a lot about the country when I spent nearly 7 months bicycling across China in 1998. From that catalog I chose 11 stories I considered well written, of some interest to a travel reader and about travelling in China. They were of varying styles and, to be candid, quality, so I ordered them from what I considered to be the best to the…well, least best.
When the offer to publish one of those stories arrived I was elated. I’d been published here and there in bits and blurbs, and had written and produced a play, however, getting a story into Travelers Tales was the biggest professional coup, by far, and no one had ever paid to publish my words.
After the initial elation subsided I realised it bothered me that the editor had chosen the ninth story, The Wheat was Ripe and it was Sunday, by-passing eight I thought to be significantly better written, more illuminating, and/or a better representation of the country I’d written the story about. Though I’d had one story accepted, eight better stories had been rejected. That gave me something to ponder…
…but didn’t stop me from cashing the cheque when it arrived! Woot!
After a bit of pondering I realised that the editor hadn’t rejected any stories. Instead, he’d read through each one with enough interest and curiosity to read another, and then the next, until he decided on what he thought to be the most appropriate for his publication. The realisation dawned: I’d been paid a great compliment. If he preferred the ninth, he was satisfied enough with the preceding eight to want to read it.
A copy of the newly published anthology arrived several months later. For those of you who’ve not had the experience, it’s quite a rush holding a copy of a published book containing your words. I immediately turned to the table of contents, found my story and read it. The next rush was discovering that the story had been published without any edits. I read it again, then went back to page one and read the whole book through.
While reading all the stories published alongside mine, I realised how perfectly that one story fit into the other stories chosen by the editor, how much better it was for the publication than all the others I’d submitted. I also looked at the story itself, and saw a number of qualities in it I hadn’t recognised before. It’s a much better story than I’d initially thought.
Not until I read Daryl’s article did I realise I’d picked up some useful tools for learning from rejection, even though I’d been accepted.
3 Things I Learned About Rejection by Being Accepted
- A rejection letter doesn’t necessarily mean your story isn’t any good. It may just mean the editor feels it’s not right for the publication. Don’t expect every editor to explain this in the letter, but if it contains any inducement to submit in the future take that to heart, then submit. The editor wants you to.
- Do I recommend throwing every marginally satisfactory story you’ve got into a submission? NO! I was lazy and silly and very lucky. In retrospect, one of my “top 3″ submissions, though one of my favourite pieces of writing, was completely inappropriate for the anthology. Editors spend hours a day reading and if the first item in a submission is just wrong for their publication, they may not bother to read the rest. So, do your research. Rather than the 3 or 4 best stories you’ve written, submit the 3 or 4 stories the publisher wants. In your submission, you should be able to confidently explain to the editor why each of your submissions should appear in their publication.
- Run a post-mortem after every rejection. This is a learning opportunity. Armed with at least a little insight into what didn’t work this time, go back and research the publisher again. Someone else’s story got accepted so try and figure out why. If you can, read the story or article the editor chose to publish over yours. How is it different from yours; What makes it more suitable to the publisher’s needs? This process may provide ideas for changing or editing your story so it’s more publishable. You may realise you submitted the wrong story altogether but remember another you’ve already written is worth submitting. Also, having another look at the publication could inspire a whole new story idea. All positive outcomes from a negative experience.
Rejection Isn’t Always About the Quality of Your Work
Do Your Research
Learn How To Get Accepted